thorns
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
thorns [2016/10/30 17:47] – removed pinkgothic | thorns [2017/11/18 15:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | And then it's gone. It's gone, but he's still thinking. The pain is still registering. There' | ||
+ | |||
+ | For [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Thorns** (sometimes called **Chesters**) are hybrid creatures, part animal, part Cheshire. The hybridisation is not genetic - a Thorn still has their full set of animal DNA, and a full set of the equivalent Cheshire structures. On a technological level, they are best considered Cheshires with avatars - Cheshires protective of the flesh they' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * most often, the Cheshire grew along the neural structures of the host and in adopting their form adopted much of the thinking as well | ||
+ | * an urge for self-preservation manifested early in the Cheshire and became an ideological thought | ||
+ | * given two equally alien structures (fellow Cheshires versus animals), the Cheshire component of the Thorn opted to identify with animals in a form of loose allegiance | ||
+ | * it was quicker for the Cheshire component to learn the capabilities of the host than its own full capabilities | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Method of creation ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Generally speaking, Theta takes care to conduct his experiments with // | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following things need to happen for an original Thorn to arise: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * one of Theta' | ||
+ | * the sentience does not attain sapience or is otherwise not subsequently convinced to rescind its consciousness (~90% chance) | ||
+ | * it needs to understand its host and its own capabilities sufficiently rapidly to rebel (~20% chance) | ||
+ | * it must successfully survive Theta' | ||
+ | |||
+ | This means that only about one in fifty of Theta' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thorns are not necessarily human, though sapient Thorns almost exclusively are. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It's possible for Thorns to create other Thorns (by deliberately doing what Theta did on accident), but it requires a Thorn with an actual understanding of the process of fleshgrafting. In addition, given that it's a personality-destroying process, it will likely rarely be done. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Abilities ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | As Thorns are simply Cheshires grafted to flesh, they inherit all of the Cheshire abilities and weaknesses, though their fleshbound nature alters quite a few of these: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * They continue being able to **dematerialise** substances. | ||
+ | * They' | ||
+ | * That said, they can still **warp spacetime**, | ||
+ | * They can still do **shadow play**. Generally speaking, the Cheshire component of Thorns can be very expansive depending on how much the Thorn has fed their Cheshireself, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Technically, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Weaknesses ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thorns continue being weak to water. They can drink it and digest it (their Cheshireself is grafted to those parts of the flesh that aren't preoccupied with these things) and if their Cheshireself is small enough they can swim through it, but their Cheshireself is just as vulnerable to it as a proper Cheshire. The high water content animals typically possess tends to cause Thorns a very low background level of chronic pain, but it's low enough that they may not be conscious of the effect. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Despite the ability to swim through water, Thorns are typically // | ||
+ | |||
+ | All that said, one of the // | ||
+ | |||
+ | This extends to their own kind, meaning that they would not, from appearances alone, be able to determine that a supposed Thorn ally they’ve had a year of experience with is actually a Cheshire spy since the past week. |
thorns.1477849677.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/11/18 15:34 (external edit)